National

Poll observers give mixed verdict

Share Bookmark Print Rating
 Justice Sophia Akuffo, the head of AU Election Observers Mission, former Zambia President Rupiah Banda

Left to right: Justice Sophia Akuffo, the head of AU Election Observers Mission, former Zambia President Rupiah Banda, the head of mission of Electoral Institute For Sustainable Democracy Africa (EISA) election observers, and former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo, the head of the CommonWealth election observers after presenting their reports on the 2016 general election at Sheraton Kampala Hotel yesterday. PHOTO BY ALEX ESAGALA. 

By  FREDERIC MUSISI

Posted  Sunday, February 21  2016 at  02:00
SHARE THIS STORY

Kampala- International election observers gave Thursday’s presidential polls a mixed bill of health with the European Union and Commonwealth groups describing it as short of being free and fair, while the African monitors praised the exercise.

The European Union Election Observation Mission (EU-EOM), who condemned the actions of the police prior to voting and on polling day, commended the voters’ enthusiasm to participate in the election process, citing their active involvement in the campaigns and the long hours they queued up waiting to vote.

The EU observers said this enthusiasm in the democratic process, however, was eclipsed by an atmosphere of intimidation and further concluded that the Election Commission lacks the required independence and transparency, which explains why “it does not have the trust of the stakeholders.”

The various election mission observer groups invited by the government to monitor the 2016 presidential and parliamentary polls yesterday issued their preliminary assessments of the Thursday polls, which offered a number of key pointers.

“Yesterday [Friday], while the national tally centre was announcing the preliminary results of the presidential polls and the political parties were still following tallying and collecting data from their agents in the field, the police stormed FDC’s party headquarters using tear gas and arrested the flag bearer Kizza Besigye and the party’s leadership. This extensive use of police force was not acceptable,” notes the EU-EOM chief observer Eduard Kukan in a statement.

“This is of particular concern, since the EU-EOM in its preliminary statement notes that the pre-election campaign was marked by a polarised discourse and an intimidating atmosphere, which was mainly created by state actors and which affected both voters and candidates,” Kukan added.

The EU-EOM chief observer told journalists at Sheraton Kampala Hotel that despite making wide-ranging recommendations during the previous elections (2006 and 2011) in their reports on how to make the electoral process acceptable to everyone, the Electoral Commission had totally “learnt nothing.”

“I saw the remarkable commitment of Ugandans to participate in their electoral process. Regrettably, the EC failed to communicate effectively steps that would have been needed to overcome growing tensions caused by markedly delayed delivery of voting material,” Mr Kukan said.

“Moreover, the decision to block access to social media on election day added overall uncertainly and unreasonably constrained freedom of expression and access to information.”

According to the EU-EOM preliminary report, the EC clearly lacks independence and it is hard to trust it to conduct transparent elections.

It [EC] “narrowly interpreted its mandate by limiting it to the organisation of the technical aspects of the elections. It also lacked transparacy in its decision and failed to inform the voters and contestants on key elements of the electoral process in a timely and comprehensive manner,” the EU observers stated.

The EU-EOM report also pointed out the intimidation and harassment of the Opposition and its supporters by police, the conduct of state broadcaster [Uganda Broadcasting Corporation] by denying Opposition air space, the orchestrated use of State resources and personnel for campaign purposes of the incumbent President Museveni, among others.

While the polls were conducted in a generally peaceful and calm environment in the various parts of the country, Mr Kukan noted that the National Resistance Movement’s “domination of the political landscape distorted the fairness of the campaign and state actors created an intimidating atmosphere for both voters and candidates, which continued in the days immediately following elections.”

He EU also said the delays to deliver voting materials, deployment of police and military even around polling stations left behind a bitter taste on the voting exercise.

Speaking at the same event, the head of the European Parliament, Jo Leinen, who joined the EU-EOM to monitor the elections, observed that going back to two previous reports they had issued, “it was clear the same recommendations had been made, were not acted upon, and it was likely the same recommendations would be made.”
“These challenges, however, we hope will be resolved through a peaceful manner,” Mr Leinen said.

1 | 2 | 3 Next Page»