The killings have made Rwandans more united, says Kagame

What you need to know:

commemoration. In the sixth part of the series on genocide, we bring you the speech by president Paul Kagame at the 20th commemoration of the genocide in Kigali, on April 7

Excellencies Heads of State and governments,
Excellency Secretary-General of the United Nations,
Excellency chairperson of the African Union Commission,
Former Heads of State and government,
Distinguished government officials from around the world,
Esteemed guests,
My fellow Rwandans:

I don’t have enough words to express my appreciation to all of you, who have come from near and far to be with us, on a day as important as this. I also thank all of those who have stood with us in Rwanda’s incredible journey of rebuilding.

We are gathered here to remember those who lost their lives in the Genocide and comfort those who survived. As we pay tribute to the victims, both the living and those who have passed, we also salute the unbreakable Rwandan spirit, to which we owe the survival and renewal of our country.

To our parents, children, brothers, and sisters who survived — to Rwandans who defied the call to genocide and to those who give voice to their remorse — it is you who bear the burden of our history.

We have pursued justice and reconciliation as best we could. But it does not restore what we lost.
Time and again, these past 20 years, Rwandans have given of themselves. You have stood before the community to bear witness and listened to others do the same. You have taken responsibility and you have forgiven.

Your sacrifices are a gift to the nation. They are the seed from which the new Rwanda grows. Thank you for allowing your humanity and patriotism to prevail over your grief and loss. Thank you very much.

Historical clarity is a duty of memory that we cannot escape. Behind the words “Never Again”, there is a story whose truth must be told in full, no matter how uncomfortable.

The people who planned and carried out the genocide were Rwandans, but the history and root causes go beyond this country. This is why Rwandans continue to seek the most complete explanation possible for what happened.
We do so with humility as a nation that nearly destroyed itself. But we are, nevertheless, determined to recover our dignity as a people.

Twenty years is short or long depending on where you stand but there is no justification for false moral equivalence. The passage of time should not obscure the facts, lessen responsibility, or turn victims into villains.
People cannot be bribed or forced into changing their history. And no country is powerful enough, even when they think that they are, to change the facts. After all, les faitssonttêtus [facts are stubborn].

Therefore, when we speak out about the roles and responsibilities of external actors and institutions, it is because genocide prevention demands historical clarity of all of us, not because we wish to shift blame onto others. And those others should have their moment to be humble in the face of historical facts.

The colonial legacy
All genocides begin with an ideology — a system of ideas that says: This group of people here, they are less than human and they deserve to be exterminated.

The most devastating legacy of European control of Rwanda was the transformation of social distinctions into so-called “races”. We were classified and dissected, and whatever differences existed were magnified according to a framework invented elsewhere.

The purpose was neither scientific nor benign, but ideological: to justify colonial claims to rule over and “civilise” supposedly “lesser” peoples. We are not.

This ideology was already in place in the 19th century, and was then entrenched by the
French missionaries

who settled here. Rwanda’s 2,000 years of history were reduced to a series of caricatures based on Bible passages and on myths told to explorers.
The colonial theory of Rwandan society claimed that hostility between something called “Hutu”, “Tutsi”, and “Twa” was permanent and necessary. This was the beginning of the genocide against the Tutsi, as we saw it 20 years ago.

With the full participation of Belgian officials and Catholic institutions, this invented history was made the only basis of political organisation, as if there was no other way to govern and develop society. The result was a country perpetually on the verge of genocide.

However, Africans are no longer resigned to being hostage to the world’s low expectations. We listen to and respect the views of others. But ultimately, we have got to be responsible for ourselves.

Reconciliation, the Rwanda way
In Rwanda, we are relying on universal human values, which include our culture and traditions, to find modern solutions to our unique challenges. Managing the diversity in our society should not be seen as denying the uniqueness of every Rwandan.

If we succeed in forging a new, more inclusive national identity, would it be a bad thing? We did not need to experience genocide to become a better people. It simply should never have happened.

No country, in Africa or anywhere else, ever needs to become, quote, unquote, “another Rwanda”. But if a people’s choices are not informed by historical clarity, the danger is ever present.

This is why I say to Rwandans — let’s not get diverted. Our approach is as radical and unprecedented as the situation we faced. The insistence on finding our own way sometimes comes with a price. Nonetheless, let’s stick to the course.

To our friends from abroad — I believe you value national unity in your own countries, where it exists. Where it doesn’t, you are working to build it, just as we are. We ask that you engage Rwanda and Africa with an open mind, accepting that our efforts are carried out in good faith for the benefit of all of us.

For those who think that for Rwanda, or Africa to be governed properly by its people, by the leaders chosen by these people still requires their endorsement, they are still living in a too distant past. We want you to know that we appreciate your contributions, precisely because we do not feel you owe us anything.

Rwanda was supposed to be a failed state. Watching the news today, it is not hard to imagine how we could have ended up. We could have become a permanent U.N. protectorate, with little hope of ever recovering our nationhood.

We could have allowed the country to be physically divided, with groups deemed incompatible assigned to different corners. We could have been engulfed in a never-ending civil war with endless streams of refugees and our children sick and uneducated.

But we did not end up like that. What prevented these alternative scenarios was the choices of the people of Rwanda. After 1994, everything was a priority and our people were completely broken. But we made three fundamental choices that guide us to this day.

One — we chose to stay together. When the refugees came home — we were choosing to be together. When we released genocide suspects in anticipation of Gacaca — we were choosing to be together. When we passed an inclusive constitution that transcends politics based on division and entrenched the rights of women as full partners in nation-building, for the first time — we were choosing to be together.

When we extended comprehensive new education and health benefits to all our citizens — we were choosing to be together.

Two — we chose to be accountable to ourselves. When we decentralise power and decision-making into the towns and hills across the country — we are being accountable.

When we work with development partners to ensure that their support benefits all our citizens — we are being accountable. When we award scholarships and appoint public servants based on merit, without discrimination — we are being accountable.

When we sanction an official, no matter how high-ranking, who abuses their power or engages in corruption, we are being accountable. As a result, our citizens expect more from government, and they deserve it.

Three — we chose to think big. When Rwandans liberated our country, we were thinking big. When we created Rwanda’s Vision 2020 and committed to meeting our development goals, we were thinking big. When we decided to make Rwanda attractive for business, we were thinking big.

When we invested in a broadband network that reaches all our 30 districts, we were thinking big. When we became a regular contributor to United Nations and African Union peacekeeping missions, we were thinking big.

Looking to the future
We may make mistakes, like every country does. We own up and learn and move forward. There is more hard work ahead of us than behind us. But as Rwandans, we are ready.

A few years ago, at a commemoration event, I met a young man who was one of the 12 people pulled alive from under 3,000 bodies in a mass grave at Murambi. He still lived nearby, totally alone. When the perpetrators he recognised came home from prison, he was understandably terrified.

When I asked him how he managed, he told me: “I could not do it unless I was convinced that these impossible choices are leading us somewhere better.”

Twenty years ago, Rwanda had no future, only a past. Yet as Fidel told us just now, today we have a reason to celebrate the normal moments of life that are easy for others to take for granted. If the Genocide reveals humanity’s shocking capacity for cruelty, Rwanda’s choices show its capacity for renewal.

Today, half of all Rwandans are under 20. Nearly three-quarters are under 30. They are the new Rwanda. Seeing these young people carry the Flame of Remembrance to all corners of the country over the last three months, gives us enormous hope.

We are all here to remember what happened and to give each other strength.
As we do so, we must also remember the future to which we have committed ourselves.
I thank you.

Continues tomorrow.

Unity and reconciliation, the Rwandan way
They confessed, repented and asked for forgiveness from those whose loved ones they had raped, maimed and brutally murdered in public during the Gacaca court sessions which were held at the village level.

Though they had been in jail, without the presidential pardon and traditional court Gacaca – similar to mato put in northern Uganda – many of the ex-genocidaires, if not all, would still be in jail.

With more than 154,000 genocide suspects crammed in Rwanda prison, built more than half a century ago to accommodate a quarter of that number, the Gacaca courts system prompted the judicial process that analysts say would otherwise have taken at least two centuries to administer justice.

In order to promote unity and reconciliation in Rwanda, associations were formed to have the genocide perpetrators and survivors live together in their villages.

One such association is the Ukuri Kuganze Association in Nyamata sector Bugesera District. Its motto is “My Truth Triumphs”. The association is composed of genocide survivors, relatives of the genocidaires, referred to as “people who have their family members still jail”, people who lived outside Rwanda from 1959, as well as genocidaires, often referred to as ex-prisoners released under the presidential communication (pardon).

Nyamata township is about 40 kilometres (24 miles) south of Kigali city on the road to Burundi via Nemba frontier. When I arrive there, I find five members of the association, three male ex-prisoners, one female genocide survivor and one female whose husband is still in jail.

According to Didas Kayinamura, 42, an ex-prisoner and chairperson of the association, Ukuri Kuganze was established on August 1, 2003.
“Its objectives are to promote unity and reconciliation, fight the genocide ideology against the Tutsi and to support good government and development in Rwanda,” Kayinamura says.

As the interview progresses, there is an indication from the group that it will be easier for the government to propel economic transformation from the grass roots through such associations.

When asked about reconciliation, the sole survivor present, Rachel Mukantabana, 35, whose two brothers and two sisters were killed, says: “We forgave them. What else could we do? And we are living together in harmony.”

In a separate interview, Kayinamura is hesitant to talk about what he calls past mistakes caused by bad politics. But I insist and ask: “So, were you an Interahamwe?”

Finally, he opens up: “No, I was not in the Interahamwe which was trained by the presidential guard. I was in a village militia group which hunted every Tutsi using all means, including hunting dogs.”
“How many did you kill?” I inquire

He hesitantly answers: “At first I killed 9 Tutsi…” then suddenly, the conversation ends and his final words are: “I don’t like talking about the past mistakes.”

All the ex-prisoners that I speak to, including those that do not want to go on record, do regret their actions. They were in their in 20s or younger, unemployed, vulnerable and easy to dupe. The older ones had been indoctrinated for years.

Another genocidiare says that the Interahamwe leaders told them that the Tutsi had killed president Habyarimana and every Hutu was next. “Therefore in defence, it was right and safe to kill every Tutsi before he killed you,” they were told.

Such was the toxicity that the government of Rwanda has been working to drain from the society through unity and reconciliation and other programmes such as “Ndi Munyarwanda” (I am Rwandan) that educates and preaches the value of humanity, harmony and tranquility for all Rwandans.

By Faustin Mugabe