Reviews & Profiles

why nyamwamba river unleashed its wrath again

Share Bookmark Print Rating

The recent floods in Kilembe, Kasese District, left several residents homeless while others have their houses barely hanging onto their foundation. PHOTO BY Abdulaziizi Tumusiime 

By Abdulaziizi K. Tumusiime. Additional reporting by Enid Ninsiima

Posted  Friday, May 23   2014 at  16:24

In Summary

When the Kasese floods happened last year causing destruction, promises were made in regard to avoiding a similar incident. However, early this month, the floods happened again. We explore what happened between when the promises were made and the recent floods

SHARE THIS STORY

Richard Musinguzi is a resident of Kilembe, Kasese District. Last year, he joined the statistics of homeless people after a heavy flood destroyed his house. His employer, Kilembe Mines, saved him with an offer of another house. However, early this month, disaster threatened to return his name onto the list of the destitute.

His current house barely survived destruction. His compound looks like a dumping site for debris. “These days, when it rains I carry my jacket and climb the hills. It is safer,” he says.

What the floods left behind
Kilembe is a mining settlement located more than 20 kilometres from Kasese town. It is predominantly a valley. On May 8, the area dominated news headlines again. Not for the copper that it was once known for producing, but rather the harmful floods that have occurred there, two years in a row.

The road to the notorious Kilembe Mines is only passable by hoping, skipping and jumping onto the boulders that shattered the tarmac.
Some houses have no doors, windows, roofs and have been abandoned. Others only balance on a shaky foundation pillars. A strong wind would, without a doubt, send these crumbling like the proverbial pack of cards.

Residents have not fully conceived the destruction. It is more than 10 days since the occurrence, but some still stop in their tracks, look at the extent of the devastation, shake their heads and proceed amidst murmurs. Non – residents also roam the area in bigger numbers. They observe, chat and pull out their cameras to capture the misfortune on their gadgets.

The gurgle of the erratic River Nyamwamba is within earshot. The sound (which never seems to go away when one is in Kilembe) is a stark reminder, to the people, that as long as the solution to the problem is not established and addressed, more damage is bound to occur.

What promises were made
The residents say the problem is known but was simply not solved. “When the first floods took place last year, everyone including the locals and the authorities, knew the ruin would not have been terrible if River Nyamwamba was periodically dredged. So, we were all in agreement about the source of the problem,” Musinguzi states.

“The Municipality leaders therefore promised that the river would be de-silted, first. Thereafter infrastructural repairs would be done.” Was this done? No. Why? Godfrey Kabyanga, the Municipal Mayor says the local authority did not have the resource capacity to correct the situation.

“In turn, we wrote a comprehensive report to the Office of the Prime Minister indicating what had befallen the Municipality and what ought to be done. We emphasised that training or dredging the river should be done first before the affected infrastructure or people could be rehabilitated,” he says adding that the government responded.
However, it did not follow the priorities as listed for it by the local authorities. Efforts were put into dealing with the effects rather than the genesis of the problem. How? The infrastructure - bridges and road - were catered for first instead of the River Nyamwamba as had been recommended,” he explains.

Thus, the Kilembe bridge was mended. A gabion wall was put up. The damaged road to the mines was repaired at a whopping cost of Shs2.9 billion.
Did the relevant authorities choose to ignore the recommendations from the folk who were the immediate victims of the floods?

“Nothing was ignored. The challenge was the variation in availability of resources by the two players – UNRA and Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE) - that were responsible for addressing the situation,” remarks John Kennedy Kasawuli, Uganda National Roads Authority’s station engineer in Kasese.

UNRA was responsible for the bridges and the road while MWE was responsible for the river.
“UNRA was fortunate to get some funds to undertake its work while MWE was not,” Kasawuli offers. “We could not sit back and wait for them to get their funds so that we could start at ago. So, we embarked on doing what was expected of us as UNRA.”

The engineer explains the other reason why the road and bridge were given priority instead of the river; “We had not envisaged the floods re-occurring soon,” Kasawuli states. The last time river Nyamwamba behaved in the manner it has been behaving, lately, was in the early 1960s, 50 years back. There was a gap of many years between the two events.

“Bearing that in mind, there was some confidence that we should fix the roads as a stopgap measure to facilitate activities in Kilembe,” says Kasawuli station engineer in Kasese. He adds, “We did not want to put business at a standstill.

Divesture of the mines had just been done and it was necessary for the investors to access them. There is a hydro power station, which was taking off and we had to ensure that we open up the road to facilitate the project. There were also schools and other social amenities that had to be accessed.”

1 | 2 Next Page»