On July 21 a chartered plane airlifted Julius Ssekitoleko to Uganda. Ssekitoleko, an amateur weightlifting athlete, was part of the Ugandan entourage to the Olympics tournament that is currently ongoing in Japan.
It is reported that Julius was co-opted on to Uganda’s National Olympics team even when officials knew he had not met the qualification mark. This was soon to be proved in Japan when he failed to pass the preliminary tests on arrival.
Accordingly, his date of return was set for Tuesday. Before that return date, Ssekitoleko failed to show up for routine Covid-19 test raising concern on his whereabouts. Julius’s note was later found in which it is said he confessed that he had disappeared to find work in Japan to support his struggling family in Uganda. In response, a search party was sent out but before he would be found, it is reported that Julius returned to the Olympics Village on his own.
Since his return, the media has been awash with reports about the miserable financial troubles that Ssekitoleko and his family have to deal with. His mother recounts in some of the media interviews of how she has been providing financial support to him to afford food. She further notes that he had to borrow money to buy food supplements.
Ssekitoleko’s woes are no isolated incident. Many athletes in Uganda continue to struggle to access decent treatment through availability of decent sports facilities, payment of allowance, government medal prize money and decent employment offers for representing our country.
Over time, the charade has formed up when sports persons excel with reactive – often unfulfilled – awards, luncheons, and hot air platitudes. It all often serves to gratify the emotional needs at the time, where there is victory.
Where there is no victory, they often go unnoticed and where a wrong decision is made, like appears to have happened in Ssekitoleko’s situation, a sledgehammer is used. Welfare of sports persons must be structured as a policy issue. There must be a deep reflection on how we treat our sports men and women, both in victory and defeat.
His repatriation also puts to the fore the longstanding concerns of labour externalisation and related concerns, especially considering that the apparent alleged reason for his disappearance was bent to becoming a migrant worker.
It was swiftly undertaken raising a question whether it is political will or a resource challenge undermining government’s ability to deal with repatriation of Ugandans stuck on labour externalisation missions gone bad.
The government’s labour externalisation programme continues to be bedeviled by human rights abuses of migrant workers resulting into conditions of human trafficking, modern day slavery and killings.
Ugandan migrant workers remain vulnerable to extortion and exploitation both within the recruitment and deployment processes due to lack of standards of operation for recruitment agencies and companies in terms of recruitment and their operations.
Government should expedite the process of developing and adoption the national migration policy that adequately provides for labour migration so as to guide the efforts in streamlining the externalisation of labour.
Author: Edward Serucaca Jnr