First the ghettos, then university halls: Is it time to notice People Power?

Kyadondo East MP Robert Kyagulanyi (left) campaigns in 2017. FILE PHOTOS

What you need to know:

Analysis. Bobi Wine has been regarded by the more sceptical analysts as one with an ability to ride on and reflect the public mood but who lacked concrete support beyond his personal charisma. Recent developments, however, require a reassessment of that view of Bobi Wine and his People Power pressure group, writes Timothy Kalyegira.

When Robert Kyagulanyi, better known as Bobi Wine, announced his intention to contest the Kyadondo East by-election in 2017, his musical background and wide name recognition assured him of at least a second or third place finish.
He was not dismissed as a political joke.
When he won by a landslide, many attributed that to his appeal as a musician rather than for what he represented musically.
He was viewed as a non-threatening popular choice, so much so that even the ruling NRM party heatedly congratulated him after his victory.
When he hit the campaign trail on behalf of other Opposition candidates during subsequent by-elections, some began to speak of the “Bobi Factor” in these victories.

Others, though, pointed out that the winning Opposition candidates in Jinja West (Paul Mwiru), Bugiri Municipality (Asuman Basalirwa) and Arua Municipality (Kassiano Wadri) were popular in their own right, reflected the prevalent political mood in the area, and all that Bobi Wine had done was correctly read the mood and align with it.
He was not the decisive factor that had contributed to the by-election win.
When Bobi Wine, Gerald Karuhanga, Francis Zaake and other political activists were arrested and mistreated in Arua during the campaigns of August 2018, they gained much national and international sympathy and support.
Some analysts still interpreted this as a typical sympathy vote rather than a vote on substantive issues.

In other words, Bobi Wine has been regarded by the more sceptical analysts and commentators as one with a good sense of timing, with an ability to ride on and reflect the public mood but who lacked concrete support beyond his personal charisma; a one-man political movement.
Recent developments, however, require a reassessment of that view of Bobi Wine and his People Power pressure group.
During the student guild elections at Kyambogo University in Kampala just over a week ago, the candidate representing People Power, Jonathan Tundulu, won the presidency.
Also last week, Julius Kateregga, who also stood on the People Power ticket, won the guild presidency at Makerere University.
Two wins at two premier universities in Kampala certainly is a statement of intent.

Strategy. Winner of the Makerere University guild race Julius Katerega (right) and the runner up Joshua Mukisa (left) both identified themselves with the People Power pressure group. Centre is Kyadondo East MP Robert Kyagulanyi. COURTESY PHOTOS

Significance
Since the 1960s, Makerere University has traditionally been viewed as the bellwether of Ugandan politics, the institution that reflects current political sentiment and allegiance.
After these two wins at Kampala-based universities with a wide range of students from most of Uganda’s ethnic groups and districts, People Power can no longer be dismissed as a spontaneous uprising among the disenchanted urban school dropouts.
It clearly has tapped into something real. What is that it has tapped into?

For one, the long stay or overstay in power by President Yoweri Museveni is the very least of the grievances.
Museveni has now been in power for longer than any other East African leader and longer than the average age of at least 70 per cent of the Ugandan population.
To an older Ugandan, the NRM’s rise to power can seem like just yesterday, but to anyone below 35 this feels like an entire lifetime – which it is.

Secondly, the way in which politics is conducted in Uganda, often in open disregard to the law, with corruption remaining open, rampant and unpunished, wears down the spirit of any citizen.
Thirdly, there are real, structural challenges to the country’s youth. They have grown up in a period of tuition fees in institutions of higher learning and where anything of quality is expensive.
After struggling through university or tertiary institution, there are few job openings.
For the few who chance upon jobs, usually in the range of Shs300,000 to Shs800,000 a month, it soon becomes clear that their salaries cannot cover their living expenses, from rent to transport, food and utilities.

The Internet, social media and smartphones that had been welcomed as vital business tools have proved disappointing. The fact of being on WhatsApp, Facebook or Twitter has not translated into any meaningful contacts or job and business opportunities for most young people.
Those who venture out into entrepreneurship are soon faced with the burden of rent and at best a trickle of customers.
Those who venture still further, say to the Middle East for menial jobs, report mistreatment and overwork.
Uganda’s youth have a legitimate feeling of bitterness, desperation and helplessness with things as they are.
This is the sentiment that Bobi Wine has tapped into.
Before Bobi Wine and People Power, the Reform Agenda in 2000 and later the FDC party tapped into this growing sense of disenchantment across the country.

In 2006, in its first general election as a party, the FDC quickly won enough seats in Parliament to become the second-largest Opposition party and displace the Democratic Party and the Uganda People’s Congress from their historical position.
The common thread that binds the FDC and People Power is this instinctive appeal to the economically disempowered population, fed up with bad governance.

If People Power, which started off as a loose gathering of the “urban lumpen”, has now crossed over into university residential halls and lecture rooms, we had better sit up and start taking notice.
The question is: Why, then, was it People Power to win at Kyambogo and Makerere and not the FDC?
Was it that People Power presented better candidates or the FDC had weak candidates?
Or did People Power attract votes from some DP, FDC, UPC and independent students, as Kizza Besigye did in 2006 and 2011?

During the student guild elections at Kyambogo University in Kampala just over a week ago, the candidate representing People Power, Jonathan Tundulu, won the presidency.

Rainbow coalition
In 2002, during the general election in Kenya, a rainbow coalition called NARC formed and won the election, bringing the veteran minister Mwai Kibaki to power.
At the time, Kibaki got key support from another veteran Opposition politician Oginga Odinga who, under normal circumstances should have been a rival to Kibaki.
NARC was made possible by the mood in Kenya.

There was a general feeling that the country was deep in a crisis, the rampant corruption under president Daniel arap Moi was destroying society and Moi was the one, singular problem that Kenya faced.
People Power seems to be a kind of Ugandan NARC – a spontaneous uprising cutting across party lines and ideology and focused on what is considered the single most urgent and most important issue.
Or, perhaps, an earlier Ugandan movement, the UNLF formed in Moshi, Tanzania, in March 1979 four months into the Tanzania-Uganda war.
Representing different political parties, fighting groups, study groups, activist groups, what bound the UNLF together was the focus on Idi Amin as an existential problem to Uganda, the one issue over which they were all in agreement.

People Power seems to be the latest such movement.
Usually when political and economic conditions degenerate and a sense of existential crisis comes upon the land, then political movements formed to reflect and address that crisis become unstoppable.
Monitoring radio talk shows in Kampala over the last six months, it is striking how many studio guests and callers openly and proudly identify themselves as People Power.

One can only speculate that over the last 13 years, in the unconscious of many, the FDC, DP, UPC and other parties have settled into a routine of establishment party politics.
They have lost their first love, as the Biblical Book of Revelations might put it. The urgency has gone.
People Power is regarded as being a return to that first urgency, to that sense of pure mission and national crisis.
The next questions can only be how much People Power can scale across Uganda. Does it remain an informal, unstructured grassroots movement? Does it become a formal political party?
Is it stronger as a grassroots movement or as an institutional party?
Does becoming a formal party bedevil it with the internal tensions and fights such as overcame the FDC and NRM?

Remaining a loosely-organised movement bound together by that conviction of Uganda as facing an existential crisis in the hands of the NRM government would be the best way to sustain the sense of urgency and purity to People Power.
It becomes harder to infiltrate or predict.
And, as the Kyambogo and Makerere guild victories attest, a movement organised around an idea rather than a party secretariat can still win and defeat more established and better funded parties.
To sum it up, the two university triumphs are the first concrete proof that Bobi Wine the person and People Power the idea are both one and the same, and two different entities.

Bobi Wine inspires intense loyalty, but the idea he represents – a Uganda robbed left, right and centre, day in, day out; native-owned land being grabbed by people in power; preferential treatment given to foreign investors over local businesses; and a widening gap between the few who get to enjoy the best education, healthcare, housing and jobs and the many who are being driven into a permanent underclass – is one that stands on its own merit.
That makes People Power an idea and movement rooted in current, deeply-important structural realities and national crisis.